Current:Home > StocksPrince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K. -AssetLink
Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
View
Date:2025-04-19 03:18:14
Prince Harry is facing a royal setback in his quest for protection.
London's High Court has ruled against the Duke of Sussex on May 23 over his attempt to pay for his own security when he's in the U.K.
After he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties amid their move to America in 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex lost access to police security that usually accompanies royal members. Now, according to Reuters, the High Court in London has ruled his lawyers could not move forward with a judicial review that would explore whether he could pay for the protective agents himself.
The decision to take away publicly-funded security was made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, also known as RAVEC. And according to the BBC, Judge Martin Chamberlain said in his ruling said that RAVEC was not incorrect in their decision that allowing payment for protection would be against public interest.
E! News has reached out to Harry's reps for comment and have not heard back.
The ruling comes less than one week after Harry, Meghan and her mom Doria Ragland were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase" with "highly aggressive paparazzi," per the couple's rep, after attending a gala in NYC on May 16.
After the incident, authorities also addressed the situation, telling E! News in a statement, "There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard."
Get the latest tea from inside the palace walls. Sign up for Royal Recap!veryGood! (195)
Related
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Yellow lights are inconsistent and chaotic. Here's why.
- How long does it take for the pill to work? A doctor breaks down your birth control FAQs.
- Thousands of US hotel workers strike over Labor Day weekend
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Scottie Scheffler caps off record season with FedEx Cup title and $25 million bonus
- Giving up pets to seek rehab can worsen trauma. A Colorado group intends to end that
- California lawmakers approve legislation to ban deepfakes, protect workers and regulate AI
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Brittany Cartwright Explains Why She Filed for Divorce From Jax Taylor
Ranking
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Venice Film Festival welcomes Pitt and Clooney, and their new film ‘Wolfs’
- Four Downs and a Bracket: Clemson is not as far from College Football Playoff as you think
- Police say 1 teen dead, another injured in shooting at outside Michigan State Fair
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Rapper Fatman Scoop dies at 53 after collapsing on stage in Connecticut
- Sephora Flash Sale: Get 50% Off Shay Mitchell’s Sunscreen, Kyle Richards’ Hair Treatment & More
- Get 50% Off Ariana Grande Perfume, Kyle Richards' Hair Fix, Paige DeSorbo's Lash Serum & $7 Ulta Deals
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Johnny Gaudreau's widow posts moving tribute: 'We are going to make you proud'
Murder on Music Row: Corrupt independent record chart might hold key to Nashville homicide
Tennessee football fan gets into argument with wife live during Vols postgame radio show
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Brad Pitt and Girlfriend Ines de Ramon Make Red Carpet Debut at Venice International Film Festival
Remembering the Volkswagen Beetle: When we said bye-bye to the VW Bug for the last time
Summer camp lets kids be kids as vilifying immigration debate roils at home